Open Access and Peer-reviewed
Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board Aims & Scope About Journal News & Announcements


Research Article 


The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions

Amran Suadi.

Abstract
Justice is one of the objectives of the law that the judge wants to uphold. Because justice is subjective and individual, it cannot be separated from place, time, and others which greatly affect the sense of justice of judges. Fairness becomes even more important when 'questions of law' are applied to 'questions of facts'. Justice is defined as a value for creating ideal relationships between humans. They have the right according to law and morality as stated in the popular doctrine "fiat justitia ruat caelum" which means that justice must be upheld even though the sky is falling. Biological justice is a normative entity committed to realizing human dignity. Biological Justice Theory offers a broader understanding of the meaning of justice.

Key words: philosophy of justice , biological justice ; judge's decisions


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Amran Suadi
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Amran Suadi. The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions. EEO. 2021; 20(5): 3899-3906. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427


Web Style

Amran Suadi. The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions. http://ilkogretim-online.org//?mno=68263 [Access: April 09, 2021]. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Amran Suadi. The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions. EEO. 2021; 20(5): 3899-3906. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Amran Suadi. The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions. EEO. (2021), [cited April 09, 2021]; 20(5): 3899-3906. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427



Harvard Style

Amran Suadi (2021) The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions. EEO, 20 (5), 3899-3906. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427



Turabian Style

Amran Suadi. 2021. The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions. Elementary Education Online, 20 (5), 3899-3906. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427



Chicago Style

Amran Suadi. "The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions." Elementary Education Online 20 (2021), 3899-3906. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Amran Suadi. "The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions." Elementary Education Online 20.5 (2021), 3899-3906. Print. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Amran Suadi (2021) The Philosophy of Justice, Biological Justice and Their Practices in Judgment Decisions. Elementary Education Online, 20 (5), 3899-3906. doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.427








AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed
&
Abstracted


Indexing

İlköğretim Online (IOO) - Elementary Education Online (EEO) is indexed in:


ABOUT JOURNAL
POLICIES
STATEMENTS