Muslim Methodologies And Schools In Critiquing The Doctrine Of Crucifixion

Abstract

The belief in the crucifixion of Christ is one of the core doctrines held by Christians, which they instill in their followers through various methods and approaches. However, the Qur’an explicitly refuted this flawed doctrine. Despite this, classical and contemporary exegetes have differed in interpreting the incident of Christ’s crucifixion, and their views diverged into three main opinions. Each of these views came to represent a distinct interpretative school concerning the understanding of the crucifixion doctrine.

This study aims to clarify and highlight the methodologies of these interpretative schools, explaining the reasons behind their differing views, while also showing how they converge in their theological and doctrinal conclusions regarding faith.