The Argumentative Structure In The Poetry Of Arab Nationalism
Abstract
The nationalist tendency necessitates the existence of persuasive positions from the speaker, through which they seek to highlight a spirit of solidarity with the country that culturally and civilizationally attracts them, where shared national and religious sentiments flow between the two parties.
Thus, the means of persuasion in dialogue can be divided into two methods:
- Convictions directed by the sender to the supportive recipient (solidarity argumentation)
- Convictions directed by the sender to the opposing recipient (dialectical argumentation).
This argumentative style represents a dual approach to persuasion, as it embodies a national solidarity spirit by presenting arguments and evidence that indicate an understanding and exploration of the depths of the Algerian revolution. It also reveals a confrontational spirit opposing the philosophy of the colonizer, clarifying the perspectives of global public opinion regarding the Algerian revolution.
