Open Access and Peer-reviewed
Home Journal Issues Guide for Authors Editorial Board Aims & Scope About Journal News & Announcements


Research Article 


INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS

Moumita Sen.

Abstract
The word “access to justice” served to locus on two basic purposes of legal system – the system by which people may vindicate (claim) their rights and/or resolves their disputes under the general auspices support of the state. But today, in India, our legal system has undergone such a deep state of crisis that it is not able to provide justice to common man. Thus it has badly failed to come up to the aspirations of half – clad and half – hungry masses of independent India. Two general principles are inherent in the concept of adjudication that is ‘resolving disputes’ and ‘finding the truth.’ Adjudicators are to decide disputes by the applications of rules and principles. Even assuming that the rules and principles are correct, a dispute will not be properly decided in accordance with them unless the ‘truth’ or ‘correct facts’ are determined. In the present system in India, which is adversarial, litigants have found themselves impaled on this unholy trident of delay, cost and complexity. Now this paper shall examine the typical consequences of the adversarial mode and explain how the present system of access to justice is not based on the parity of powers between parties that leads to the denial of justice.

Key words: Indian judicial, access to justice, adversarial mode


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Moumita Sen
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

Moumita Sen. INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS. EEO. 2021; 20(5): 5005-5012. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559


Web Style

Moumita Sen. INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS. http://ilkogretim-online.org//?mno=72401 [Access: April 12, 2021]. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

Moumita Sen. INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS. EEO. 2021; 20(5): 5005-5012. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

Moumita Sen. INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS. EEO. (2021), [cited April 12, 2021]; 20(5): 5005-5012. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559



Harvard Style

Moumita Sen (2021) INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS. EEO, 20 (5), 5005-5012. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559



Turabian Style

Moumita Sen. 2021. INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS. Elementary Education Online, 20 (5), 5005-5012. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559



Chicago Style

Moumita Sen. "INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS." Elementary Education Online 20 (2021), 5005-5012. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

Moumita Sen. "INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS." Elementary Education Online 20.5 (2021), 5005-5012. Print. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

Moumita Sen (2021) INQUISITORIAL VS ADVERSARIAL – CANVASSING A CHANGE IN THE INDIAN JUDICIAL PROCESS. Elementary Education Online, 20 (5), 5005-5012. doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.05.559








AUTHOR LOGIN

REVIEWER LOGIN

Indexed
&
Abstracted


Indexing

Ýlköðretim Online (IOO) - Elementary Education Online (EEO) is indexed in:


ABOUT JOURNAL
POLICIES
STATEMENTS